Arizona Center for Disability Law

 

 

 

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                                                     Contact: Jerri Katzerman, Staff Attorney

October 3, 2005                                                                               (602) 274-6287

jkatzerman@azdisabilitylaw.org

 

                                               

 

Arizona Center for Disability Law Petitions Arizona Supreme Court for Rule Change

 

Petition Seeks Exemption for Lay Representation at

Special Education “Due Process” Administrative Hearings

 

Public Comment Period Expires November 21, 2005

                                                                                                                                   

 

Phoenix, Arizona...The Arizona Supreme Court (Court) is requesting public comment on a petition filed by the Arizona Center for Disability Law (Center) which seeks an exception to the unauthorized practice of law for specially trained advocates to represent families and children in special education due process administrative hearings.

 

“We have requested this change to the Rules of the Arizona Supreme Court to ensure that parents and children with disabilities are able to effectively exercise their due process rights,” said Jerri Katzerman, Staff Attorney at the Center, who filed the petition.  “Just as individuals challenging Arizona Health Care Cost Containment (AHCCCS) can authorize an agent to represent their interests in obtaining publicly funded health services, a parent should be permitted to authorize a specially trained advocate to represent his or her interests in a special education administrative hearing.”

 

The petition urges the Court to amend Rule 31(c).  Specifically, the petition requests an exemption under the regulation of the practice of law “regarding any matter relating to the identification, evaluation, educational placement, or the provision of a free appropriate public education for a child with a disability or suspected disability, a party may be represented by a duly authorized agent who is not charging a fee for the representation.”

 

Under its authority, the Court receives and considers petitions to the rules that govern the operation of the courts and the practice of law.  On September 22, 2005, the Court met to consider the Center’s petition.  The Court decided to circulate the Center’s petition for public comment until November 21, 2005.  Following the expiration of the public comment period, the Court will consider whether to adopt, amend or reject the proposed rule change.

 


“It is important for the disability community to speak up and let the Arizona Supreme Court know that we support this rule change,” said Katzerman.  “There is an unmet legal need of families with special education needs and not enough lawyers who practice in special education law.  Under these circumstances, it is appropriate to permit non-lawyers with specialized training to assist families in special education hearings.”

 

Individuals who want to comment on the Arizona Supreme Court rule changes must submit an original and 6 copies of their comments to the Clerk of the Supreme Court, 1501 West Washington Street, Room 402, Phoenix, Arizona 85007.  The envelope must be marked “Rule Comment.” A copy must also be provided to the Arizona Center for Disability Law.  Written public comments cannot exceed 20 pages in length. 

 

Disability activists can visit http://www.azdisabilitylaw.org  for more information about the pending rule change.

                                                                                                                                                           

- 30 -

 

The Arizona Center for Disability Law is a not for profit public interest law firm, dedicated to protecting the rights of individuals with a wide range of physical, mental, psychiatric, sensory and cognitive disabilities.  The Arizona Center for Disability Law is authorized under various federal statutes to ensure the protection and advocacy of all individuals with disabilities in the state.